records
50 records
Research topics
Concepts, system position, values, methodology, and knowledge framework.
50 records
29 / 50
2008 - 2026
Cambridge University Press · 4 records
37 records
4 records
3 records
3 records
2 records
1 records
4 records
3 records
3 records
3 records
2 records
2 records
The UN Treaty Collection provides status information, parties, declarations, reservations, and treaty texts for multilateral treaties deposited with the UN Secretary-General.
A Ministry of Justice theory article discusses categories of foreign-related legal talent, practical scenarios, and collaborative training pathways.
The essay analyzes the conceptual origin, system position, and domestic-international linkage of foreign-related rule of law, making it a useful foundational reading for the portal.
The 2025 State Council legislative plan emphasizes coordinated domestic and foreign-related rule of law and stronger legislation in key, emerging, and foreign-related fields.
An open-access Hague Journal on the Rule of Law article reviewing the emergence, functions, and legal-political significance of China’s foreign-related rule of law.
This Hague Journal on the Rule of Law article traces the evolution of the concept of foreign-related rule of law in Chinese policy and academic discourse.
26 records
24 records
13 records
12 records
Use the search panel below to quickly filter and locate records in this topic.
The UN Treaty Collection provides status information, parties, declarations, reservations, and treaty texts for multilateral treaties deposited with the UN Secretary-General.
A Ministry of Justice theory article discusses categories of foreign-related legal talent, practical scenarios, and collaborative training pathways.
The essay analyzes the conceptual origin, system position, and domestic-international linkage of foreign-related rule of law, making it a useful foundational reading for the portal.
The 2025 State Council legislative plan emphasizes coordinated domestic and foreign-related rule of law and stronger legislation in key, emerging, and foreign-related fields.
An open-access Hague Journal on the Rule of Law article reviewing the emergence, functions, and legal-political significance of China’s foreign-related rule of law.
This Hague Journal on the Rule of Law article traces the evolution of the concept of foreign-related rule of law in Chinese policy and academic discourse.
This Legal Daily excerpt from China Legal Science (2024 Issue 5) addresses the underlying logic, conceptual boundaries, and theoretical expression of foreign-related rule of law.
Published in Peace and Development, this research essay examines foreign-related rule of law through legal warfare, long-arm jurisdiction, and external risk response.
This English-language education article uses coordination between criminal law and international law as an example for designing foreign-related rule-of-law education and interdisciplinary talent training.
Jiang He’s article in SJTU Law Review discusses the knowledge system of foreign-related rule of law and interactions between domestic constitutional norms and international soft law.
This official Q&A explains the reform resolution’s requirements for foreign-related rule of law, including work mechanisms, legal services, talent training, and participation in international rule-making.
An editorial in Chinese Journal of Transnational Law introducing the special issue on legalization of foreign relations in China.
A China Law Society article discussing the goals, implementation pathways, and safeguards of foreign-related rule of law. This portal provides only a bibliographic summary.
Huang Huikang reviews the Law on Foreign Relations as a foundational and comprehensive law within China’s foreign-related legislative system.
The 2024 reform resolution calls for strengthening foreign-related rule of law, improving foreign-related legal and implementation systems, and deepening international cooperation in law enforcement and justice.
The Supreme People's Court released the first batch of cases on ascertainment and application of foreign law in foreign-related civil and commercial disputes.
This article analyzes China’s Foreign Relations Law through political framing, comparative international law, and the idea of fundamental norms governing international relations.
The Ministry of Justice summarizes China's progress in foreign-related legal services, lawyers, institutions, and talent development.
The article discusses how legal education can support foreign-related rule of law through talent supply, interdisciplinary training, and theoretical system building.
This China Law and Society Review article analyzes the SPC’s role in foreign-related adjudication, judicial interpretations, typical cases, and the China International Commercial Court.
This article explains the significance of foreign-related rule of law for high-level opening-up, protection of national interests, and participation in global governance.
Based on foreign-related civil and commercial cases, the article discusses difficulties, cost allocation, and procedural improvement in ascertaining foreign law.
This Law-Based Governance Studies article compares early reform-era foreign-related legal institutions with the current foreign-related rule-of-law agenda, highlighting expanded sovereignty, security, development, and international-rule functions.
The article discusses the logic, institutional foundation, and practical path for integrated promotion of domestic and foreign-related rule of law.
At the CPC Central Committee Political Bureau's study session on November 27, 2023, Xi Jinping emphasized building China's foreign-related legal system and capacity to support high-level opening-up and respond to external risks.
Matthew S. Erie analyzes FROL through the U.S.-China trade war, lawfare, Global South engagement, and Chinese-style modernization.
A 2023 white paper explaining China’s vision of a global community of shared future, its global governance concepts, and proposals for multilateral cooperation.
The Law on Foreign State Immunity defines China's jurisdictional rules for civil cases involving foreign states and their property.
The Law on Foreign Relations, effective July 1, 2023, provides a foundational framework for China's foreign relations, including principles, institutional responsibilities, and legal safeguards.
The MFA concept paper sets out China’s Global Security Initiative, including a common, comprehensive, cooperative and sustainable security vision and twenty cooperation priorities for global security governance.
The article discusses talent training for foreign-related rule of law across disciplinary systems, academic systems, skill systems, and practical training scenarios.
A Brookings report reviewing China’s engagement with international law across issue areas and analyzing how China uses and shapes legal norms.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs treaty database provides public access to important bilateral and multilateral treaties concluded or acceded to by China.
This law sets conflict-of-law rules for foreign-related civil relations and is a foundational text for foreign law ascertainment, private international law, and cross-border civil and commercial disputes.
In a public lecture, Huang Huikang argued that legal argumentation in international disputes has become central to protecting national interests, and stressed that major-power diplomacy must be law-centered while resisting politicization of legal rules.
This lecture review from Nanjing University records Huang Huikang’s analysis of the draft Law on Foreign Relations, highlighting integrated design across legal levels and the need to connect legislation, policy, and enforcement.
Huang Jin discusses core international-law principles such as sovereign equality, non-interference, and peaceful settlement, arguing for a more just global order rooted in the UN Charter and international legality.
The address presents an integrated framework for foreign-related rule-of-law building through coordinated legislation, enforcement, and adjudication, including rules for extraterritorial application and countering abusive long-arm jurisdiction.
In his keynote, Huang Jin argued that genuine multilateralism must be coupled with international law and equal participation by all states, rather than selective legal-imposition by powerful countries.
The keynote links rapid technology change with international-law development, highlighting the need for timely legal governance in areas such as AI, blockchain, and cross-border data in the new technological order.
The paper examines how states participate in international law-making, using the development and implementation of the law of the sea to discuss norm design, interpretation, and institutional enforcement.
Taisu Zhang’s symposium essay in Asia Pacific Law Review develops general propositions on why authoritarian regimes may have strong incentives to pursue legality.
Kwai Hang Ng analyzes China’s authoritarian legality through legal gradationalism, courts, quasi-law instruments, and Supreme People’s Court-local court dynamics.
Susan H. Whiting reviews the relationship between authoritarian legality and state capitalism in China, connecting property, economic governance, and party-state legal institutions.
Shucheng Wang’s Cambridge monograph analyzes sources of Chinese law for authoritarian legality, including constitutional structure, judicial interpretations, judicial documents, and guiding cases.
Shucheng Wang distinguishes normal and exceptional authoritarian politics and uses China to explain legal instrumentalism in an illiberal context.
Tom Ginsburg and Taisu Zhang argue that contemporary Chinese politics has become more law-oriented even as party-state power has centralized.
Mary E. Gallagher’s Cambridge monograph uses labor law and labor disputes to explain how authoritarian regimes can use legal institutions to manage conflict and reinforce governance.
Yuhua Wang’s Cambridge monograph explains when authoritarian rulers respect the rule of law, emphasizing foreign investors, regional variation, and organized interests.
This edited volume by Tom Ginsburg and Tamir Moustafa is a foundational comparative study of why authoritarian regimes establish and use courts, providing context for China-focused authoritarian legality scholarship.
No matching records