Library
Bibliographic entries and summaries for foundational theory and specialized issues.
A Ministry of Justice theory article discusses categories of foreign-related legal talent, practical scenarios, and collaborative training pathways.
The essay analyzes the conceptual origin, system position, and domestic-international linkage of foreign-related rule of law, making it a useful foundational reading for the portal.
The article examines extraterritorial data-law regimes in the United States and Europe and proposes a Chinese paradigm for data-law extraterritoriality and blocking mechanisms.
This International Business article analyzes barriers to cross-border data flows through value, norm, and fact dimensions and proposes rule-of-law responses.
An open-access Hague Journal on the Rule of Law article reviewing the emergence, functions, and legal-political significance of China’s foreign-related rule of law.
This Shanghai University of International Business and Economics Law Journal article studies the extraterritorial effect of China’s anti-sanctions law through jurisdiction, application, and comity.
This Hague Journal on the Rule of Law article traces the evolution of the concept of foreign-related rule of law in Chinese policy and academic discourse.
This Frontiers in Marine Science article examines China’s marine security rule-of-law system, relevant to maritime governance, overseas interests, and foreign-related legal capacity.
This Legal Daily excerpt from China Legal Science (2024 Issue 5) addresses the underlying logic, conceptual boundaries, and theoretical expression of foreign-related rule of law.
Published in Peace and Development, this research essay examines foreign-related rule of law through legal warfare, long-arm jurisdiction, and external risk response.
This Procuratorial Daily article discusses collaborative training bases that bring practice resources into legal education and connect teaching, research, and case-handling practice.
This English-language education article uses coordination between criminal law and international law as an example for designing foreign-related rule-of-law education and interdisciplinary talent training.
Jiang He’s article in SJTU Law Review discusses the knowledge system of foreign-related rule of law and interactions between domestic constitutional norms and international soft law.
The article evaluates China’s blocking statutes from the perspective of private actors, legal uncertainty, conflicting obligations, and procedural support.
An editorial in Chinese Journal of Transnational Law introducing the special issue on legalization of foreign relations in China.
A China Law Society article discussing the goals, implementation pathways, and safeguards of foreign-related rule of law. This portal provides only a bibliographic summary.
Huang Huikang reviews the Law on Foreign Relations as a foundational and comprehensive law within China’s foreign-related legislative system.
This article analyzes China’s Foreign Relations Law through political framing, comparative international law, and the idea of fundamental norms governing international relations.
William S. Dodge introduces China’s Foreign State Immunity Law to English-language readers and compares it with U.S. FSIA experience.
Mo Jihong’s People’s Forum article places foreign-related legal services within the foreign-related rule-of-law workflow and discusses paths for improving legal services and the business environment.
The article focuses on the scope, contractual effects, and improvement of China’s blocking rules, relevant to sanctions, countermeasures, compliance, and overseas interest protection.
The article discusses how legal education can support foreign-related rule of law through talent supply, interdisciplinary training, and theoretical system building.
This China Law and Society Review article analyzes the SPC’s role in foreign-related adjudication, judicial interpretations, typical cases, and the China International Commercial Court.
This article explains the significance of foreign-related rule of law for high-level opening-up, protection of national interests, and participation in global governance.
Based on foreign-related civil and commercial cases, the article discusses difficulties, cost allocation, and procedural improvement in ascertaining foreign law.
This Law-Based Governance Studies article compares early reform-era foreign-related legal institutions with the current foreign-related rule-of-law agenda, highlighting expanded sovereignty, security, development, and international-rule functions.
The article discusses the logic, institutional foundation, and practical path for integrated promotion of domestic and foreign-related rule of law.
Matthew S. Erie analyzes FROL through the U.S.-China trade war, lawfare, Global South engagement, and Chinese-style modernization.
The article analyzes Article 12 of the Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law through tort, joint liability, and damages theories.
A CICC research article on how the one-stop mechanism integrates litigation, arbitration, and mediation into an integrated dispute resolution system.
The article discusses talent training for foreign-related rule of law across disciplinary systems, academic systems, skill systems, and practical training scenarios.
The essay examines courts’ roles in cross-border data disputes, including jurisdiction, conflict rules, evidence, recognition and enforcement, and judicial cooperation.
A China Rule of Law International Forum essay on digital trade rules, cross-border data flows, source-code protection, and China’s approach to rule-making.
This Journal of International Economic Law article reviews the Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law, including countermeasures, prohibitions, private remedies, and business implications.
A MERICS analysis assessing the AFSL as a counter-sanctions, blocking, and extraterritorial legal instrument with implications for foreign actors and companies.
This open-access AJIL Unbound essay frames the CICC as conservative innovation and examines its one-stop design, jurisdictional limits, and transnational enforcement issues.
A MERICS brief analyzing China’s first unified export control law, extraterritorial compliance risks, and the U.S.-China-EU technology competition context.
A Brookings report reviewing China’s engagement with international law across issue areas and analyzing how China uses and shapes legal norms.
An insider article in The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law on the CICC, its one-stop mechanism, expert committee, and recommendations for improvement.
This Journal of International Dispute Settlement article compares the CICC with other international commercial courts and analyzes jurisdiction, internationalization, and enforcement challenges.
An International & Comparative Law Quarterly article analyzing the CICC framework, challenges for overseas parties, and reform opportunities from a comparative perspective.
In a public lecture, Huang Huikang argued that legal argumentation in international disputes has become central to protecting national interests, and stressed that major-power diplomacy must be law-centered while resisting politicization of legal rules.
This lecture review from Nanjing University records Huang Huikang’s analysis of the draft Law on Foreign Relations, highlighting integrated design across legal levels and the need to connect legislation, policy, and enforcement.
Huang Jin discusses core international-law principles such as sovereign equality, non-interference, and peaceful settlement, arguing for a more just global order rooted in the UN Charter and international legality.
The address presents an integrated framework for foreign-related rule-of-law building through coordinated legislation, enforcement, and adjudication, including rules for extraterritorial application and countering abusive long-arm jurisdiction.
In his keynote, Huang Jin argued that genuine multilateralism must be coupled with international law and equal participation by all states, rather than selective legal-imposition by powerful countries.
The keynote links rapid technology change with international-law development, highlighting the need for timely legal governance in areas such as AI, blockchain, and cross-border data in the new technological order.
Ruo Huanxin’s article analyzes the legal status of the Ryukyu Islands and self-determination claims through historical context and international legal criteria.
The paper examines how states participate in international law-making, using the development and implementation of the law of the sea to discuss norm design, interpretation, and institutional enforcement.
This English-language commentary analyzes how legal language and narrative framing in South China Sea disputes affect interpretation, implementation, and regime-level governance.
This article approaches island-status disputes through historical acts of occupation and temporal legal principles, analyzing how legal effects should be assessed under maritime law.
Using the China–Philippines arbitration as context, the article discusses China’s procedural and legal response to dispute settlement mechanisms under UNCLOS.
This study focuses on conflicts of coastal-state jurisdiction in navigation safety and seeks legal coordination mechanisms between enforcement and safe passage objectives in contested waters.
Examining use of force at sea and environmental protection, this article links maritime security enforcement to environmental governance and legitimacy constraints.
Sun Nanxiang analyzes patterns and incentives behind U.S. unilateral trade actions and suggests legal responses within WTO-based multilateral frameworks.
The article discusses the status of consumers as data subjects and associated protection mechanisms, offering a framework for cross-border data governance and compliance duties.
Li Xiaoling discusses how DSU appeal arbitration can preserve continuity in WTO dispute settlement when the Appellate Body is in transition.
The article maps negotiation deadlocks and strategic choices in WTO appellate reform, and explores practical responses from China’s perspective.
The article traces WTO security exception practice since GATT and evaluates justiciability as well as non-violation remedies for constraining unilateral security-based measures.
Jiang Xiaohong examines how public-interest considerations can be integrated into anti-dumping adjudication and what doctrinal risks and constraints follow from this integration.
No matching records